[Skip to content]

Legion
British Legion
Search our Site
.

British troops – just a PR opportunity?

Legion magazine editorial

Published: 7 December 2009

It would be naïve to think that the war in Afghanistan shouldn’t be on the political agenda in the run-up to a general election.

British involvement is a contentious and emotive issue. Politcal parties know only too well that their actions and words on the subject could well dictate how many people vote at the polls.

It should be a matter for political debate too – how many people want to live in a country where there isn’t healthy and open discussion of the rights and wrongs of sending troops into battle?

The problems come when people try to exploit the situation for political gain. The prime minister should visit troops who have been injured while fighting. He is the one who sent them into battle, their injuries will be on his conscience. And why shouldn’t those who have lost limbs or their sight have the chance to meet him face-to-face?

However, these visits must be regular, done in good faith, and not be used as a PR opportunity. Soldiers should be asked in advance if they want to meet him. They shouldn’t be left with the option of pulling the curtain around their beds or not – it’s undignified.

Seeing political leaders fall over themselves to be photographed with remembrance poppies in the background last month was an unedifying sight and the fear is that the PM’s hospital visits will be viewed in the same light.

Likewise with the BBC’s decision to host Question Time in Wootton Bassett this week. The town has done the country proud with the way it marks repatriations. But does taking a media circus to Wiltshire help anyone?

It smacks of sensationalism rather than serious debate, a PR stunt rather than respect. The debate could have been held in a TV studio anywhere in the country – does taking it to a school hall in Wootton Bassett do anything but trample on people’s raw feelings?

Being caught in the cross-fire is nothing new for service personnel, but the general election’s proximity is causing collateral damage and self-inflicted wounds. It needs to stop.

COMMENTS

1. At 17.45 on 7 December 2009, B.Sweeny wrote:

This story could also be looked on as having a political agenda,  anything Gordon Brown does is bound to be wrong, even if its right. Sure he's the man that sent them, how would any of you like to have that responsibility, of sending young men and women into any battle zone, it's easy to criticise. I wouldn't like to be making these decisions, So, if Brown was just electioneering, Cameron's visit to Afghanistan be viewed in the same way, and as for Wootten Bassett, it makes me wonder, if all those lads that died back in the 50s, had been repatriated in the same way, rather than being buried in places such as, Cyprus, Malaya and Aden. Would the call to bring them home, have been just as loud, and what change would it have made to British history?


2. At 19.41 on 9 December 2009, Jim wrote:

I agree with your editorial. Visits to injured service men & women should be organised with the consent of the visited.

With regard to the BBC I do not believe that it is anything more than a stunt.


3. At 00.56 on 10 December 2009, Vartangkol wrote:

Question Time in Wootton Bassett?  You could have told me it was to be held in Edinburgh Castle and I wouldn't have known!  It makes no difference, but if emphasised both in the press and on TV then it is sensationalising the event.  Will the people of W.B. get a chance to put their views?  Will those who stand respectfully along the 'path of pain' be invited to question the reason for all these young, brave  people to return in this way?

» Indicates required fields

Make a comment
Display your name? »